Legislature(1999 - 2000)
1999-05-04 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1999-05-04 Senate Journal Page 1227 SB 67 SENATE BILL NO. 67 was before the Senate in second reading. Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 1 : Delete Page 2, line 29, and Page 3, lines 1 and 2 Renumber following sections accordingly. 1999-05-04 Senate Journal Page 1228 SB 67 Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Senator Green objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SB 67 Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie Nays: Donley, Elton, Green, Kelly Pete, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Excused: Lincoln Tim Kelly changed from "Nay" to "Yea". and so, Amendment No. 1 failed. Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 2 : Page 9, lines 1-2: Delete under AS 44.62 (Administrative Procedure Act), but not before January 1, 2000. Insert January 1, 2002 Page 9, line 7: Delete January 1, 2000 Insert January 1, 2003 Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 2. Objections were heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1999-05-04 Senate Journal Page 1229 SB 67 SB 67 Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Elton, Halford, Hoffman, Leman, Mackie, Taylor Nays: Green, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Excused: Lincoln and so, Amendment No. 2 failed. Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 3 : Page 3, lines 1 and 4: Delete 31 percent Insert 15 percent Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 3. Senator Pete Kelly objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SB 67 Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 6 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Elton, Halford, Hoffman Nays: Green, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Excused: Lincoln and so, Amendment No. 3 failed. 1999-05-04 Senate Journal Page 1230 SB 67 Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 4 : Page 3, line 1: Delete 31 percent Insert 15 percent Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 4. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SB 67 Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Leman Nays: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Excused: Lincoln and so, Amendment No. 4 failed. Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 5 : Page 3, line 1: Delete 31 percent Insert 15 percent Page 3, line 4: Delete 31 percent Insert 40 percent Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 5. Senator Torgerson objected. 1999-05-04 Senate Journal Page 1231 SB 67 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SB 67 Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 2 NAYS: 17 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Ellis Nays: Donley, Elton, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Excused: Lincoln and so, Amendment No. 5 failed. Senator Ellis offered Amendment No. 6 : Page 6, line 15: Delete 33 percent of Insert an amount equal to Senator Ellis moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 6. Objections were heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SB 67 Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Elton, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly Tim, Leman Nays: Green, Kelly Pete, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Excused: Lincoln 1999-05-04 Senate Journal Page 1232 SB 67 and so, Amendment No. 6 failed. Senator Mackie moved and asked unanimous consent that the bill be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Senator Ellis objected. The question being: Shall the bill be advanced to third reading? The roll was taken with the following result: SB 67 Advance from Second to Third Reading? YEAS: 15 NAYS: 4 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Nays: Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman Excused: Lincoln and so, the bill advanced to third reading. SENATE BILL NO. 67 was read the third time. The question being: Shall SENATE BILL NO. 67 An Act relating to taxation, including taxation of income of individuals, estates, and trusts; and providing for an effective date pass the Senate? The roll was taken with the following result: SB 67 Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Dates YEAS: 0 NAYS: 19 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Nays: Adams, Donley, Ellis, Elton, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Leman, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken Excused: Lincoln 1999-05-04 Senate Journal Page 1233 SB 67 and so, SENATE BILL NO. 67 failed. Senator Mackie gave notice of reconsideration.